1. Better Project Visibility
Knowing how many possible code violations exist is the first step in improving the code. For example, Synopsys Euclide IDE generates a problem report in the graphical user interface (GUI) and optionally in a batch text form that categorizes coding problems into different severities. This gives the team a known metric to measure their code quality efforts.
2. Improved Forecasting of Code Completion
Tracking the “burn down”, or reduction, of code violations over time allows management to gauge the progress in resolving code violations. If the coding problems are not decreasing over time at a satisfactory rate, this gives visibility to the team that they may need to increase their effort to improve the code.
3. Improved Code Uniformity
All teams prefer to agree on code formatting and coding style rules, but without a tool to automate, categorize, and enforce those rules, a uniform code base is unlikely. Lack of uniform code can make documentation, reuse, or even readability of code difficult.
4. Faster Time to Production Code
Having a system to ensure best practices in coding is most effective when applied at the time of code entry. That way, the user can improve their code the instant it is written. Waiting for downsteam tools from development, such as simulation, formal, or even synthesis, to capture code problems is inefficient for developer and requires more time for corrective iterations. An IDE can help audit code as it is being written – even without requiring files to be saved!
5. Higher Quality Code
Coding problems in their simplest form are syntax violations of the language. The earlier that coding mistakes in the testbench or RTL are caught, the easier and quicker they are to fix. Otherwise, to correct syntax violations, the design must be compiled as the first step to determine code issues. A simulator like Synopsys VCS® or a formal engine like Synopsys VC Formal can detect most gross syntax violations. However, these tools are not optimized to find problems in code syntax and may take more time, detect fewer problems, and require more resources than an IDE.
An IDE can diagnose syntax problems more efficiently and also provides context to fix this class of problem efficiently. A more sophisticated form of checking exists in the hundreds of usage checks available in an IDE to assess the code more completely.
